Monday, September 10, 2012

Response to Course Material #1



So far, we haven’t done much reading in class, so I haven’t had the chance to apply what I learned in the summer homework to the text we’ll cover this year. I’m still thinking about the terms test, and I imagine I’m not the only one a little concerned with the score I got. I’m guessing that if/when we discuss the answers, it’s going to serve as an example of how there may be many different literary techniques employed in a single small excerpt of text. Memorizing some of the words was a chore; others I already knew. But we haven’t had any real use for them yet. I mean, I can now recognize all the enjambment in “Mexicans Begin Jogging”, but that hasn’t really affected my analysis and understanding of the work. (Don’t get me wrong – I noticed the use of the technique when I first read the poem and noted its effect on the narrator’s tone, but I wasn’t thinking, “Oh, look. That’s enjambment right there.”)
The one exception might be the diagnostic tests in the Peterson AP guide. No doubt it’ll be important to know those words when we take the AP test, since using correct terminology is part of knowing the subject, but we’re not just freely throwing those terms around in our casual classroom discussions.

On the other hand, I have found the summer homework we were assigned to be much more helpful. Though we haven’t done any analysis of text in class, both of the books were very helpful in analyzing the poems for the forum posts. (And I think those were pretty good practice for some of the poetry analysis questions in the diagnostic.)
The Nuts and Bolts of College Writing made me pay attention to small details that previously subconsciously affected my interpretation of literature, but that I can now recognize. For example, in both “Mexicans Begin Jogging” and “The Terrorist, He Watches”, I now specifically notice how the language is simple, but elegant. The authors use basic, but varied, language and end up with clear, concise poetry, which lends it more meaning, I think. After watching the online presentations, I’d bet that this book is going to be even more important when we practice writing essays for the AP test. Many of the points it makes are about clear communication with the reader, which is what rhetoric is all about.
How to Read Literature Like a Professor, on the other hand, didn’t play as direct a role in my analysis of the poems, but did draw my attention to various kinds of symbolism and allegory (as well as the difference between the two). I think the same type of mindset that allows me to claim that Eragon and Star Wars are the same story will help me draw connections when analyzing poetry and when writing essays. It also just gave me the chance to read “Me Talk Pretty One Day”, which is one of the few essays – I’d prefer to call it a short story – that I enjoy reading. After watching the presentations on rhetoric and argument, I was able to think back to the analysis I wrote and understand what I could have improved.

In short, we’ve mostly been gaining knowledge that enables us to read and analyze effectively and we’ve learned the terminology we need to do so. Now, we’ll probably do a lot more analysis than we’ve done so far, since we’re better prepared to jump right into it.

3 comments:

  1. Hey Mayank! :)
    I've encountered the same situation as you did on the terms test. I realized that by just memorizing the definition of those words is not gonna help me understand them and "freely throwing those terms around in our casual classroom discussions." I agree that we should do more practice like identifying the examples of the terms, that would definitely help us to do better on the next test.

    Also, The Nuts and Bolts of College Writing made me pay more attention to those small details in the movies or books. It's amazing that I can finally connect the ideas to all the works I've read before. Nice work!

    ReplyDelete
  2. (Bah late response is late.)

    Your response to the terms studying and the subsequent test (and the resulting rather unfortunate event that was getting our scores…) was spot on to my own reaction. Well, minus understanding many of the words. Either way, though, I found myself wondering why we were learning the terms at all. Sure, I knew how to recognize a specific word setup, but why did that word matter? I recognized that setup anyway, now I was just putting a name to it. Great. How very useful. (It was even better when my English major mother looked at the list of words and promptly told me that she'd never heard of half of them, even after teaching high schoolers for years.) It was only when Mrs. Holmes revealed her clever trick that I understood why we'd been told to memorize them at all.

    On to your reflections in general. You did a good job of including most of what we'd completed at that point in time, which admittedly was not so terribly much. Your voice comes through pretty clearly as well, one of the better parts of this assignment; you're free to speak your mind without needing to worry about "correctness", as it's all based on your own opinions. I definitely enjoyed the fact that you didn't just summarize all of what we've done and add on a few sentences about how they'll help in the rest of the year, but instead added in your own opinions on how helpful (or not) things seemed to you.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mayank, I was also really concerned about my score on the terms test as well. I took the time to memorize the words and felt like I really had them down but when it came to the test I bombed. If I had practiced more than just the definitions of the words I feel like I would have done better. It was a relief that ms. Holmes didn't count the scores and told us she was showing us how to study more like a colIege student than a high school one. Which was kind of a realization to me that this is a college level class. I also agree with you that the summer work was really helpful. How to read literature like a professor really made me look at books and stories I read differently. It showed me theres a lot more to stories than just what is written there. Over all you did a good job of not just listing what we did but explaining how you felt about everything and what you learned from it.

    ReplyDelete